When
you listen to or read the news from the media, how do you treat it? What’s your
response? Do you swallow is hook, line and sinker? Or do you believe it halfheartedly? Well, it’s absolutely safer to assume their chances of
happening is just 50/50. Expect the worst case scenario. Expect surprises. That
factor will always remain.
True,
there are times when the news is 100% correct. But that’s not going to happen
always. And you have to prepare yourself
for such times.
Situations have come
when the media circulated information that is totally false. The story never
occurred anywhere and was carried with such air of certainty that will leave
you with no chance to doubt. In some other times it’s just half-truth. It
really happened somehow, somewhere, but not exactly as it was presented. In
fact, at times you as an eye witness won’t recognise the same story you’ve once
known. And you begin to ask yourself, why? Would the news agencies really
betray the trust their audiences have on them by deliberately circulating false
information?
The point to bear in
mind is that the media thrive on rumours. A rumour is a “tall tale of
explanations of events circulating from person to person and pertaining to an
object, event, or issue in public concern.” According to Wikipedia, ‘rumour
involves some statements whose veracity is not quickly or ever confirmed’ and
is ‘often discussed with regards to misinformation and disinformation’.
Misinformation is seen as simply false information which is passed to the masses
while the latter is more of deliberately created false information, especially
those given by the government to the media.
A lie can travel halfway around te world while the truth is putting on its shoes.
For an example, close to
a decade ago, I listened to a radio station from Abia state, Nigeria, cast
news. In the report, a man and his three kids had been reportedly drowned in
their village river when they went to fetch water. And according to the news,
the sad incident happened just few days to the date the news was cast (I think
the news was cast in 2007/08). This incident, they continued, happened in a
town, Nanka, in a neighbouring state, Anambra.
When I heard the news, I
reacted like many people would: shocked to the marrow and filled with sorrow. I
couldn’t just help but pity the poor family and prayed such calamity never come
my way. But then, I had the privilege to verify the authenticity of the report.
Well, initially though, I wasn’t intended on proving how true or false, I was
only trying to know if someone around would know the family such evil befell.
Nanka is a moderately
sized village-esq community. The vibration of such an incident would’ve been
felt for days, non-stop. I am from Nanka. At the time of this news, I was at
Nanka too. I relayed the story to my mum who was not far away from where I sat
with the radio by my side and she was, as expected, shocked- the kind triggered
by surprise. She had gone to the market earlier that day, and if such happened,
that would’ve been the talk of the town. The community was peaceful and
everything moved smoothly too.
Why was she then
surprised? Because she knew the story well. And she knew it happened more than twenty
(20) solid years prior to the date it was cast.
So, even though the event happened, but the family had overcome the
pains and sorrow it brought two decades prior. You would wonder why that radio
station would go on to cast such news without verification: not under this day in history, but as current
news. That will remain less of a mystery if you understand how these agencies
work.
Clearly, not all cases
are like the story above. Some are worse off while others are less grievous.
But in the end, they affect your mood, your psychology and even your response
and perception towards a fellow human being, a situation, or group of people.
You won’t know how thousands of people who heard the same story who couldn’t
verify would be filled with sympathy and sorrow. And you trust they believed it
as true.
No need to expand on the
government-owned news media which does not seem to see any evil done by the government.
After all who wants to be shown the exit door? The masses may suffer to death;
they can be killed by the police or soldiers. But as long as the culprit is the
government, the news is never heard beyond the scene it occurred. Maybe CNN
(America), BBC (Britain) and NTA (Nigeria) will serve as clear examples.
The bottom line is that
the news we read or listen to can be greatly altered by several factors, the
government being the chief culprit. Aside from the government and few other
‘bosses’ whose interests are protected by the media outlet, there is also
another reason why the media enjoy rumours.
The reason is: profit.
The major reason anybody is in business is to make profit. Humans run
businesses, but profit keeps the business running. And how would a media
outlet, let’s take an online news blog for an example, succeed if it has to
verify all the facts of the news before it’s published online? Remember the
staff has to be paid. Infrastructures have to be bought, installed and
maintained. The more your audience, the more your profit is likely to become.
News has time relevance
attached to it. If you want to verify all the facts before you publish, the
news may appear stale to the audience because it is either that another news
media had done that before you, or the time the news is relevant has gone. So,
as soon as a spark of information rises, every news media catches the skeleton,
pads it with flesh and muscles and sell.
And they know, profit is the driving force. They want to be the first to
publish the news and grow their audience.
So aside from
deliberately giving the audience false information for any reason, perhaps
political, false rumours, especially on trending stories occur because the
outfit needs to remain in business.
So having known this,
how would you treat the news you get daily? Receive the information, it may be
true. Do not act on the information, it may be false. The rumour may be targeted
to get the audience respond in a particular way. It may be sponsored. It may
not be. The truth is that most of the information out there has an element of
truth. The problem most times is that it is either published at the wrong time,
like in the story above or has some added stories which do not really happen.
Now you have
been armed with this information, let your response to the news you hear or
read change from today. As long as you are not present at the event to witness
for yourself, assume it really didn’t happen. The press is made of humans.
Humans are created good, but don’t forget that humans are known to lie too. So while with open heart you receive, don’t
forget to assume the other way too. It may simply just be a lie.
Some
of us have heard this kind of experience with news blogs, sites and several
media outlets. Share your opinion and if this post is helpful, share to your
friends.
Correct, if we critically look at most informations that we get from these media. One can obviously identify were there is a missing link and that which is actually true.
ReplyDeleteTrue @WEmeto Daniel. When the audience know that many information they receive has a missing link, they will respond differently to them.
ReplyDelete